JWTruth.orgDocumented comparison resource
Search

Authority and accountability · Claim record

The Guardian reported the association on 8 October 2001; the Society's main representative to the UN requested termination in October 2001 and DPI disassociated the Society as of 9 October 2001.

Claim ID claim-authority-2001-withdrawal-within-days-of-guardian-reportConcerns 9 October 2001Outcome
Outcome · 9 October 2001 Verified

The Guardian reported the association on 8 October 2001; the Society's main representative to the UN requested termination in October 2001 and DPI disassociated the Society as of 9 October 2001. United Nations Department of Public Information, NGO Section, 4 March 2004The Guardian, 8 October 2001The Guardian, 15 October 2001

The organisation’s position or later explanation: Watch Tower's letters say it withdrew 'after learning of the situation' / 'when we realized' that the criteria contained language it could not subscribe to.

Show the evidence (3 sources)
Official public record Verified

United Nations Department of Public Information, NGO Section, “Letter 'To Whom It May Concern' re association of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York with DPI”

4 March 2004 · pp.1-2 · Paul Hoeffel, Chief, NGO Section, Department of Public Information · United Nations

“This organization applied for association with DPI in 1991 and was granted association in 1992. By accepting association with DPI, the organization agreed to meet criteria for association, including support and respect of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and commitment and means to conduct effective information programmes with its constituents and to a broader audience about UN activities. In October 2001, the Main Representative of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York to the United Nations, Ciro Aulicino, requested termination of its association with DPI. Following this request, the DPI made a decision to disassociate the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York as of 9 October 2001.”

The letter also reproduces the paragraph 'included in all letters sent to NGOs approved for association in 1992' (its ‘principle purpose’ [sic]: 'redissemination of information … about the United Nations'; asks NGOs to send 'issues of your relevant publications') and lists the criteria: share the ideals of the UN Charter; not-for-profit; demonstrated interest in UN issues; commitment and means to conduct effective information programmes.

Official source Archived or alternative copy Scan of original

Provenance and verification note

Confidence note. Downloaded the PDF from un.org and read both pages as images in this session; wording above transcribed from the scan.

Scan provenance. United Nations (un.org file store, linked from https://www.un.org/en/civil-society/watchtowerletter); two-page scanned PDF with DPI/NGO letterhead and signature

Corroborated by. src-un-2026-0000-civil-society-watchtower-page, src-archive-2022-0224-un-letter-copy, src-guardian-2001-1008-jw-link-to-un-queried

Notes. Also reachable via https://www.un.org/en/file/92547. A lawful scan exists at the official URL — the site can link rather than host.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-un-2004-0304-hoeffel-dpi-letter

Reputable reporting Verified

The Guardian, “Jehovah's Witnesses link to UN queried — Sect accused of hypocrisy over association with organisation it has demonised”

8 October 2001 · Stephen Bates, religious affairs correspondent · Guardian News & Media

“The United Nations is being asked to investigate why it has granted associate status to the Jehovah's Witnesses … The UN itself admitted yesterday that it was surprised that the sect, whose formal name is the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, had been accepted on its list of non-governmental organisations for the last 10 years.”

Quotes Paul Gillies (Witnesses' UK spokesman): 'We do not have hostile attitudes to governing bodies and if we are making representations on issues to the UN we will do so.' Also quotes 'a recent publication since the organisation obtained its recognition' as calling the UN 'a disgusting thing in the sight of God and his people' — that exact phrase could not be found in a WOL search (see risk register).

Official source Archived or alternative copy Scan of original

Provenance and verification note

Confidence note. Fetched the live theguardian.com article via curl (WebFetch to theguardian.com is blocked in this environment) and read the full text.

Scan provenance. Newspaper scan hosted by jwfacts.com (not opened; text verified from theguardian.com)

Corroborated by. src-un-2004-0304-hoeffel-dpi-letter, src-guardian-2001-1015-hypocrite-abandon-secret-link

Notes. Timestamp on page: Mon 8 Oct 2001 23.42 BST. Language ('sect', 'cult') is the newspaper's, not to be adopted.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-guardian-2001-1008-jw-link-to-un-queried

Reputable reporting Supported

The Guardian, “'Hypocrite' Jehovah's Witnesses abandon secret link with UN”

15 October 2001 · Stephen Bates, religious affairs correspondent · Guardian News & Media

“The Jehovah's Witnesses have hurriedly disaffiliated from the United Nations within days of a Guardian story in which members accused the sect of hypocrisy for supporting an organisation it has repeatedly denounced privately.”

Reports the withdrawal, that the organisation had 'secretly affiliated to the UN as a non-governmental organisation for 10 years', and that members who raised the matter were 'accused of apostasy'.

Archived or alternative copy Scan of original

Provenance and verification note

Confidence note. Wording matches across the culteducation.com republication and the newspaper clipping scan; the theguardian.com URL guessed (/uk/2001/oct/15/religion.world) returns 404 and the live article was not located.

Scan provenance. Newspaper clipping scan hosted by jwfacts.com; read as an image in this session

Corroborated by. src-guardian-2001-1008-jw-link-to-un-queried, src-un-2004-0304-hoeffel-dpi-letter

Notes. The brief's title 'Jehovah's Witnesses withdraw from UN' appears to be a paraphrase; the published headline is as above.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-guardian-2001-1015-hypocrite-abandon-secret-link

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-authority-2001-withdrawal-within-days-of-guardian-report/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.