ClaimAuthority and accountabilityverified1880sContext

Authority and accountability · Claim record

Russell was called “Pastor” after the Pittsburgh congregation voted him its pastor in 1882 and, by the organisation’s account, some 500 further congregations in the United States and Britain did the same. When his libel action against the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reached the New York Appellate Division in 1915, the court described him as “an unordained preacher”.

Claim ID claim-authority-pastor-titleConcerns 1882Context

The claim and its evidence

Context · 1882 Verified

Russell was called “Pastor” after the Pittsburgh congregation voted him its pastor in 1882 and, by the organisation’s account, some 500 further congregations in the United States and Britain did the same. When his libel action against the Brooklyn Daily Eagle reached the New York Appellate Division in 1915, the court described him as “an unordained preacher”. Source: Jehovah's Witnesses—Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993), 1993Source: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 7 May 1915

The organisation’s position or later explanation: Proclaimers (1993) says the title “was not a self-assumed title” because congregations conferred it by vote, and adds that Jehovah's Witnesses today do not use “pastor” or “elder” as titles and do not elect elders locally.

Show the evidence (2 sources)
Primary JW publication Verified

Jehovah's Witnesses—Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993), “Why Called Pastor (box)”

1993 · p.54 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“In view of the pastoral work that he was doing under the Chief Shepherd, Jesus Christ, certain congregations acknowledged by vote that he was their pastor. It was not a self-assumed title. The first group to vote him their pastor was the congregation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1882. Thereafter, he was voted pastor by some 500 other congregations, in the United States and Britain. ... Today, Christian elders among Jehovah's Witnesses are not elected by local congregations but are appointed by the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses. Care is also exercised not to use expressions such as “pastor” or “elder” as titles.”

A box answering the frequent criticism that Russell styled himself “Pastor” without ordination. The organisation's answer is that congregations conferred it; the box does not address ordination.

Provenance and verification note for Jehovah's Witnesses—Proclaimers of God's Kingdom (1993), Why Called Pastor (box)

Confidence note. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library; the box is labelled “[Box on page 54]” in the document, which sits in chapter 5 (jv chap. 5 p. 42 – p. 60).

Corroborated by. src-ctr-ad-1915-0507-russell-v-eagle

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-ctr-jv-1993-p54-why-pastor

Official public record Verified

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, “Charles T. Russell, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Respondent, 168 A.D. 121”

7 May 1915 · pp.121-124 · Appellate Division Reports

“The plaintiff was the editor of a publication purporting to be devoted to a religious propaganda. In it he informed his sympathetic readers that one of his associates had accumulated Miracle wheat, which the associate was disposed to sell to the readers of that publication for one dollar a pound. The associate promised to give the entire proceeds to a corporation organized and controlled by the plaintiff. In the article it was represented that the yield of Miracle wheat was ten or fifteen times as great as the yield of common wheat. The record offered in evidence tended to show, as the result of governmental experiment, that Miracle wheat was no more prolific than brands of wheat in general use and of ordinary quality. There was independent evidence that other wheats could be purchased at prices so low in comparison as to make the advertised price of Miracle wheat exorbitant.”

Russell sued over a cartoon headed “Easy Money Puzzle” carrying the line “If Pastor Russell can get a dollar a pound for Miracle wheat, what could he have got for Miracle stocks and bonds as a director in the old Union Bank?” The trial judge told the jury the cartoon was libellous and left the defence of truth to them; the jury found for the Eagle. The appeal court held the United States Department of Agriculture reports properly admitted and affirmed, with costs.

Provenance and verification note for New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, Charles T. Russell, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, Respondent, 168 A.D. 121

Confidence note. The full official-reporter text was downloaded and read on 19 September 2026. It records that judgment for the defendant was entered on 3 February 1913 and the motion for a new trial denied on 10 February 1913, and that J. F. Rutherford was on the brief for Russell on appeal. The opinion describes Russell as “an unordained preacher”.

Scan provenance. Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School Library) static edition of the official reporter, New York Appellate Division Reports vol. 168.

Notes. The opinion is per curiam; Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred, and the judgment and order were unanimously affirmed with costs. This is the appellate record of the trial that Russell reported to his own readers in The Watch Tower of 15 February 1913.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-ctr-ad-1915-0507-russell-v-eagle

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-authority-pastor-title/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.