ClaimAuthority and accountabilitysupported1910sContext

Authority and accountability · Claim record

Russell laid a charge of criminal defamatory libel against the Rev. J. J. Ross of Hamilton, Ontario in December 1912 over a leaflet Ross had published. The prosecution failed: according to Ross's own account the grand jury returned “no bill” on 1 April 1913, so the case never reached a trial jury.

Claim ID claim-authority-ross-prosecution-outcomeConcerns 1 April 1913Context

The claim and its evidence

Context · 1 April 1913 Supported

Russell laid a charge of criminal defamatory libel against the Rev. J. J. Ross of Hamilton, Ontario in December 1912 over a leaflet Ross had published. The prosecution failed: according to Ross's own account the grand jury returned “no bill” on 1 April 1913, so the case never reached a trial jury. Source: Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), 1913Source: The Watchtower, 15 May 1953

The organisation’s position or later explanation: The Watchtower of 15 May 1953 confirms that Russell “had brought a libel case” against the author of the tract and cites the Hamilton police-court record of 17 March 1913, but does not say how the case ended.

Show the evidence (2 sources)
Discovery source only Supported

Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), “Pamphlet, sub-titled ‘The history of the Libel Case: “Pastor” Russell before the Courts’”

1913 · pp.18-19 · Rev. J. J. Ross · Book Department, Philadelphia School of the Bible

““Do you know the Greek”? Asked the Attorney. “Oh, yes,” was Russell’s reply. Here he was handed a copy of the New Testament in Greek, by Westcott & Hort, and asked to read the letters of the alphabet as they appear on the top of page 447. He did not know the alphabet. “Now,” asked Mr. Staunton, “Are you familiar with the Greek language?” “No,” said Mr. Russell, without a blush.”

Ross, a Baptist minister in Hamilton, Ontario, was prosecuted by Russell for defamatory libel over a leaflet Ross had published in June 1912. This pamphlet is Ross’s own account of the proceedings, published after they ended, and the passage above is his narrative of the examination of 17 March 1913 with snatches of dialogue quoted inside it — not a transcript. Elsewhere in the same pamphlet Ross does print question-and-answer material, which he says he holds as certified transcripts.

Provenance and verification note for Some Facts and More Facts About the Self-Styled “Pastor” Charles T. Russell (of Millennial Dawn Fame), Pamphlet, sub-titled ‘The history of the Libel Case: “Pastor” Russell before the Courts’

Confidence note. Both separately digitised printings were opened and the passage read; the wording is the same in each, so it is not an artefact of one scan. In both printings this is the only place in the pamphlet where the words “alphabet” or “447” occur, and the tidy question-and-answer version that circulates online appears in neither. What cannot be confirmed is the content: this is the defendant in Russell’s own prosecution writing about his own case, and no court record, official transcript or contemporary newspaper report of the Hamilton examination was located. It is not the court record, and it is not evidence of what was said in court.

Scan provenance. Two separately digitised printings were opened: the “Forty-sixth Thousand” (Philadelphia School of the Bible) at archive.org/details/SomeFactsAndMoreFactsAboutCharlesTazeRussell, and the “Thirteenth Thousand” (North-West Bible and Tract Depot, Winnipeg) filmed by the Canadian Institute for Historical Microreproductions at archive.org/details/cihm_87677.

Notes. The same pamphlet reproduces, in question-and-answer form, passages of Maria Russell’s sworn direct examination in the Pennsylvania Common Pleas trial, which Ross says he holds as a transcript certified by the official court reporter Alexander Callow. Ross also records that “the jury found absolutely no ground for libel and handed down the verdict ‘no bill’” (page 15), and, writing on 26 May 1913, that this was “on the 1st ult.”, that is 1 April 1913. The pamphlet’s reliability is limited on its face: the leaflet of June 1912 that it reprints states that Russell’s wife “divorced him a few years ago on the ground of cruelty and of having wrong relations with other women” and that “In court, she proved improprieties between her husband and one Rose Ball” — both of which the record in this ledger contradicts.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-ctr-ross-1913-some-facts-more-facts

Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “Questions From Readers”

15 May 1953 · p.319 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society

“The “perjury” charge was not made in court, but in a tract written later by an irresponsible slanderer against whom Brother Russell had brought a libel case. The official record of the case in question (Police Court of the City of Hamilton, Ontario, March 17, 1913) says: “Q. You don't profess, then, to be schooled in the Latin language? A. No, sir. Q. Or in Greek? A. No, sir.” After this he was asked if he knew individual Greek letters, and it was over this that the question of his knowledge of Greek arose. ... Not only has the question they “quote” been reworded, but Brother Russell had specifically said that he did not know Greek.”

A reader asked whether tract charges that the Society's first president was immoral, profiteered from “miracle wheat” and committed perjury about Greek were true. The article answers “No. They were deliberate falsehoods,” and deals with all three.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, Questions From Readers

Confidence note. Opened on the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026; the page marker in the document is 319 and the citation code printed in the page is w53 5/15. The organisation here quotes a transcript of the Hamilton hearing of 17 March 1913 and concedes that Russell said he was not schooled in Greek; it disputes the wording of the version circulated by critics, not the underlying admission.

Corroborated by. src-ctr-ross-1913-some-facts-more-facts

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-ctr-w-1953-0515-qfr-charges

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-authority-ross-prosecution-outcome/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.