ClaimBlood doctrineverified1980sContext

Blood doctrine · Claim record

The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae in the Illinois Supreme Court in In re E.G., represented by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn; the organisation was therefore a participant in the litigation it later described to its readers.

Claim ID claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicusConcerns 18 November 1989Context

The claim and its evidence

Context · 18 November 1989 Verified

The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae in the Illinois Supreme Court in In re E.G., represented by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn; the organisation was therefore a participant in the litigation it later described to its readers. Source: Illinois Supreme Court, 18 November 1989

Show the evidence (1 source)
Official public record Verified

Illinois Supreme Court, “In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089”

18 November 1989 · pp.133 Ill. 2d 98 · Ryan J · Illinois Supreme Court

“If the evidence is clear and convincing that the minor is mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions, and that the minor is mature enough to exercise the judgment of an adult, then the mature minor doctrine affords her the common law right to consent to or refuse medical treatment.”

The passage the 22 May 1994 Awake! quotes, confirmed against the reported text. Opinion filed 18 November 1989; rehearing denied 29 January 1990; Ward and Clark JJ dissenting. The head matter records that the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. appeared as amicus curiae, by Donald T. Ridley of Brooklyn, New York.

Provenance and verification note for Illinois Supreme Court, In re E.G., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. E.G., a Minor, Appellee), 133 Ill. 2d 98 (1989), No. 66089

Confidence note. The full reported opinion was downloaded from the Caselaw Access Project and read; the quoted sentence, the parties, the date and the amicus entry were confirmed. Justia and CourtListener both refuse automated requests in this environment.

Scan provenance. Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School Library) static distribution of the official Illinois Reports text.

Corroborated by. src-g94d-gregory-appeals-and-standard

Notes. The Court decided the case on common-law grounds and expressly declined to decide the First Amendment question on which the Appellate Court had relied.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-g94d-ilsc-1989-eg-standard

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-blood-1994-watchtower-amicus/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.