ClaimChronology and 607 BCEverifiedundatedContext

Chronology and 607 BCE · Claim record

A seventy-year period of divinely decreed abandonment was a known formula in Mesopotamian religious writing. An inscription of the Assyrian king Esarhaddon says Marduk wrote that Babylon's abandonment should last seventy years but then 'reversed the numbers' and ordered its reoccupation after eleven.

Claim ID claim-chronology-70-years-as-conventionContext

The claim and its evidence

Context Verified

A seventy-year period of divinely decreed abandonment was a known formula in Mesopotamian religious writing. An inscription of the Assyrian king Esarhaddon says Marduk wrote that Babylon's abandonment should last seventy years but then 'reversed the numbers' and ordered its reoccupation after eleven. Source: RINAP 4: The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680-669 BC), 2011

Show the evidence (1 source)
Peer-reviewed / scholarly Verified

RINAP 4: The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680-669 BC), “Esarhaddon 104 (Babylon A), translation block i 34 – ii 9a (Akkadian ii 2-9)”

2011 · i 34 (Akkadian ii 2-9) · Erle Leichty (edition); Oracc/RINAP Project · Eisenbrauns / Oracc

“The merciful god Marduk [w]rote that the calculated time of its abandonment (should last) 70 years, (but) his heart was quickly soothed, and he reversed the numbers and (thus) ordered its (re)occupation to be (after) 11 years.”

An Assyrian royal inscription about the restoration of Babylon. It shows that a divinely decreed period of 'seventy years' of abandonment was a known convention in Mesopotamian religious writing, and that the actual interval could be far shorter.

Provenance and verification note for RINAP 4: The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680-669 BC), Esarhaddon 104 (Babylon A), translation block i 34 – ii 9a (Akkadian ii 2-9)

Confidence note. The Oracc HTML edition of Esarhaddon 104 was fetched and read on 19 September 2026. The sentence quoted falls at the end of the translation block Oracc labels “(i 34)”; the Akkadian behind it is lines ii 2-9 of the same inscription. The parallel passage was also read in Esarhaddon 105 (Q003334), where it reads “The merciful god Marduk wrote …” without the restoration bracket. This is offered as background on the “seventy years” formula, not as evidence about Jeremiah.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chr-e-oracc-esarhaddon-104

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-chronology-70-years-as-convention/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.