ClaimShunning and familyverified2020sExplicit statement

Shunning and family · Claim record

Since 2024 a baptised minor who commits serious wrongdoing first meets two elders together with his parents; the elders 'might decide that it is not necessary to take the matter any further' if the parents are 'reaching him', and a committee (with parents present) is convened only if the minor 'unrepentantly persists'; removal of a minor remains possible, and no published text says a minor's removal goes unannounced or that minors are exempt from shunning by non-household relatives.

Claim ID claim-shunning-2024-minors-procedureConcerns 1 August 2024Explicit statement

The claim and its evidence

Explicit statement · 1 August 2024 Verified

Since 2024 a baptised minor who commits serious wrongdoing first meets two elders together with his parents; the elders 'might decide that it is not necessary to take the matter any further' if the parents are 'reaching him', and a committee (with parents present) is convened only if the minor 'unrepentantly persists'; removal of a minor remains possible, and no published text says a minor's removal goes unannounced or that minors are exempt from shunning by non-household relatives. Source: The Watchtower (Study Edition), August 2024Source: jw.org (Governing Body Update video), 15 March 2024Source: Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, 29 April 2026Source: The Watchtower, 15 September 1981Source: The Watchtower (Study Edition), 15 August 2013

The organisation’s position or later explanation: The Norwegian Supreme Court found the 2024 process 'more considerate than previously' though 'distressing and humiliating' for a child, and not 'mental violence'.

Show the evidence (5 sources)
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower (Study Edition), “Study Article 34: Responding to Sin With Love and Mercy”

August 2024 · pp.20-25 · par. 17-18 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“What about baptized minors—those under 18 years of age—who engage in serious wrongdoing? The body of elders will arrange for two elders to meet with the minor and his Christian parents. ... However, what if a baptized minor unrepentantly persists in a wrong course? In that case, a committee of elders will meet with him along with his Christian parents.”

The 2024 procedure for baptised minors; par. 17 confirms reproof may still be announced 'as a warning to the rest'. Quoted by the Norwegian Supreme Court at para 94.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower (Study Edition), Study Article 34: Responding to Sin With Love and Mercy

Confidence note. Raw WOL HTML fetched; wording and page markers 20-25 confirmed.

Corroborated by. src-jwb-2024-0315-governing-body-update-2, src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-w-2024-0800-study-34-responding-to-sin

Primary JW publication Verified

jw.org (Governing Body Update video), “2024 Governing Body Update #2”

15 March 2024 · Mark Sanderson (Governing Body) · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Under our current arrangement, we don’t say a greeting to individuals who’ve been removed from the congregation. However, the Governing Body has decided that publishers can use their Bible-trained conscience to decide whether to give a simple greeting and welcome a disfellowshipped individual who attends a congregation meeting.”

Presented by Governing Body member Mark Sanderson (20 min 02 s; media id docid-1112024005). Also announces: follow-up meeting 'after a few months'; visits to those removed long ago; two elders to meet a baptised minor and parents instead of a committee; members may invite a removed person to a meeting; 'we don’t socialize with those who are removed'; 1 Cor. 5:13 'remove' terminology; sisters may wear slacks.

Provenance and verification note for jw.org (Governing Body Update video), 2024 Governing Body Update #2

Confidence note. jw.org page opened (published 15 March 2024) and the organisation's own English subtitle file (https://cfp2.jw-cdn.org/a/ceb7d7/1/o/1112024005_E_cnt_1.vtt, from the jw.org mediator API record docid-1112024005_E_1_VIDEO) read in full; quotations are from that subtitle text.

Notes. Mediator API: https://b.jw-cdn.org/apis/mediator/v1/media-items/E/docid-1112024005_1_VIDEO

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-jwb-2024-0315-governing-body-update-2

Official public record Verified

Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, “The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)”

29 April 2026 · paras 4, 39-45, 94-102, 110-127, 149-152, 227-230 · Norges Høyesterett

“Members of the religious community are thus not to associate with former members, whether disfellowshipped or withdrawn. This also applies to close relatives, unless they belong to the same household. Family ties are not severed, but with regard to family members other than those with whom one lives, contact is permitted only in necessary family matters. It is undisputed that the threshold for such contact is relatively high.”

3-2 majority (Steen, Arntzen, Hellerslia; Poulsen and Falkanger dissenting) dismissed the State's appeal and declared the refusals of registration and grants invalid; unanimous that infringement of children's rights was not proved; majority: practice 'may entail a clear psychological pressure not to withdraw' (para 123) but not 'improper pressure' under Art. 9 ECHR; dissent: right to withdraw infringed. Costs NOK 2,165,461. Quotes od 2019 p. 148, lvs pp. 39-40, ks 2019 ch. 12 par. 17, w24 Aug p. 24 par. 18, the 2022 jw.org FAQ and a JW brochure 'Jehovah’s Witnesses and Disfellowshipping'.

Provenance and verification note for Supreme Court of Norway (Høyesterett), judgment HR-2026-1009-A (case no. 25-089326SIV-HRET), official English translation published 16 July 2026, The State (Ministry of Children and Families) v. Jehovah’s Witnesses; European Association of Jehovah’s Witnesses (intervener)

Confidence note. Official English translation PDF (https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/translated-rulings/2026/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf) downloaded and read; all quoted paragraphs confirmed. Norwegian original: https://www.domstol.no/globalassets/upload/hret/avgjorelser/2026/april/hr-2026-1009-a.pdf

Scan provenance. Supreme Court of Norway, Communication Department translation (legal authenticity remains with the Norwegian text).

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-court-no-2026-0429-supreme-court

Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “If a Relative Is Disfellowshiped . . .”

15 September 1981 · pp.26-31 · par. 11, 13, 18-19, 22-26 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Consequently, Christians related to such a disfellowshiped person living outside the home should strive to avoid needless association, even keeping business dealings to a minimum.”

Distinguishes relatives in the household (family ties remain, 'spiritual ties have been completely severed'; a disfellowshipped minor is still cared for and disciplined but parents 'would not conduct a Bible study directly with the child') from relatives outside it ('limited need to care for necessary family matters'); discusses weddings, gatherings and funerals.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, If a Relative Is Disfellowshiped . . .

Confidence note. Raw WOL HTML fetched; wording and page markers 26-31 confirmed.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-w-1981-0915-if-a-relative-is-disfellowshiped

Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower (Study Edition), “Questions From Readers: Would it be appropriate for Christian parents to sit with a disfellowshipped child at congregation meetings?”

15 August 2013 · p.8 · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“parents may even study the Bible with a disfellowshipped minor who continues to live with them ... it would seem reasonable that a disfellowshipped minor could also quietly sit with his parents.”

Confirms that disfellowshipped minors at home may be studied with and may sit with parents; for adult children not at home, sitting beside relatives is 'far different' from relatives who 'needlessly seek out his company'. Cites w81 9/15 pp. 29-30 and w88 11/15 pp. 19-20.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower (Study Edition), Questions From Readers: Would it be appropriate for Christian parents to sit with a disfellowshipped child at congregation meetings?

Confidence note. Raw WOL HTML fetched; wording and page marker 8 confirmed.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-w-2013-0815-qfr-seating

Claim page

A direct link to this claim is https://jwtruth.org/evidence/claim-shunning-2024-minors-procedure/. Every source above opens the original document or the best available copy. If you believe the wording, date or context is wrong, report an error.