Source recordPrimary JW publicationverified2010sChronology and 607 BCE

Source record · Primary JW publication

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two (box: “What Does VAT 4956 Really Say?”)”

1 November 2011pp. 26-27Source ID src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-vat4956-boxAccessed 19 September 2026
Primary JW publication Verified

The Watchtower, “When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two (box: “What Does VAT 4956 Really Say?”)”

1 November 2011 · pp.26-27 · box · Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania

“Why an issue? The third line on this tablet reads that on the “night of the 9th” during the first month (Nisanu/​Nisan), the “moon stood 1 cubit in front of ß Virginis.” However, Neugebauer and Weidner wrote in 1915 regarding the year 568 B.C.E. (which would point to 587 B.C.E. for Jerusalem’s destruction) that “the moon stood 1 cubit before this star on 8 Nisan, and not on 9 Nisan.””

The box sets out six numbered points: that the Akkadian sign for 9 is visible in the photograph; that Neugebauer and Weidner changed the 9 to an 8 in their transliteration and German translation, noting the original reading only in a footnote; that Sachs and Hunger published the text in 1988 as it reads, with a 9, but rendered it in English as “9th” with the note “error for: 8th”. The tablet photograph is credited “bpk/​Vorderasiatisches Museum, SMB/​Olaf M. Teßmer”.

Provenance and verification note for The Watchtower, When Was Ancient Jerusalem Destroyed?—Part Two (box: “What Does VAT 4956 Really Say?”)

Confidence note. Full document fetched from the Watchtower Online Library on 19 September 2026 and read in full; the quotation, the paragraph and the page were confirmed against the article text and its embedded page markers (span class=“pageNum”).

Notes. The single piece of positive physical evidence the series offers for 607 BCE.

Accessed. 19 September 2026 · Source ID. src-chr-o-w-2011-1101-vat4956-box